The Interaction of Air and High Speed Rail in Japan
Transportation Research Record, 2043, 1-12 (2008)
This paper analyzes the unique convergence of factors which contributed to Japan’s outstanding public transportation system. The focus is on air and HSR. Those two modes do not complement each other as in Europe, but compete head-on in Japan. Moreover we do not have to contend with market distorting public subsidies, since both companies which operate HSR in the corridor of interest are highly profitable, and mostly so because of their HSR service.
The Japanese transportation system then provides us with an excellent environment to study the nature of competition between air and HSR (we will also touch on conventional rail where appropriate).
Individual contributors to terminal pair choice are contrasted between air and HSR and the trade-offs between accessibility, frequency, and speed analyzed in detail.
- Kasai, Y. Tokaido Shinkansen Reaches Technical Perfection. International Railway Journal, Vol. 40, 2001, pp. 30-33.
- Mayrzedt, H. Japans Autobahnen-Mautstraßen. Internationales Verkehrswesen, Vol. 53, 2001, pp. 137-141.
- Jackson, C. Effective & Speedy Wins the Traffic. Railway Gazette International, Vol 161, 2005, pp. 221-223.
- G-7 Countries: Transportation Highlights. U.S. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Transportation Statistics, 1999.
- Jänsch, E. and R. Rump, Hochgeschwindigkeitsverkehr international. In Schienenschnellverkehr, P. Münchschwander, Editor, R. v. Decker's Verlag, G. Schenck GmbH, Heidelberg, 1990.
- Kasai, Y. Tokaido Shinkansen Reaches Technical Perfection. International Railway Journal, Vol. 40, 2000, pp. 30-33.
- Hope, R. Tokaido Upgrade to Beat back Air Competition. Railway Gazette International, Vol 159, 2003, pp. 199-201.
- Tokaido Line to be Improved. International Railway Journal, Vol. 18, 2003, p. 2.
- \Knutton, M., Vertical Integration Proves to Be a Winner. International Railway Journal, Vol. 19, 2004.
- Clever, R., Airport and Station Accessibility as A Determinant of Mode Choice. Dissertation in Civil Engineering, 2006, University of California, Berkeley. http://thinkmetric.com/diss/.
- Clever, R., Eine Vision für Berlin und den Transrapid. Zeitschrift für Verkehrswissenschaft, 2005. 76(1): p. 69-89. http://thinkmetric.com/pubs/maglev/.
- Hansen, M. Airline Competition in a Hub Dominated Environment: An Application of Noncooperative Game Theory. Transportation Research, Vol. 24B, 1990, pp. 27-43.
- Umsteigewiderstände als Bestimmungsfaktor der Nachfrage im Schienenpersonenfernverkehr. Infratest Sozialforschung, München, 1992.
- Vilmart, C. and J.-F. Paix. Les Effets des Ruptures de Charge sur la Concurrence entre l'Avion et le Train. Revue Générale des Chemins de Fer, Vol. 10, 1994, pp. 17-21.
- Vrtic, M. and K.W. Axhausen. The impact of tilting trains in Switzerland: A route choice model of regional- and long distance public transport trips. In Transportation Research Board 82nd Annual Meeting, January 12-16, 2003, Washington, DC, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC.
- Jackson, C. Shinkansen Recovery Boosts Growth. Railway Gazette International, Vol. 160, 2004, pp. 686-688.
- Jackson, C. Pioneer High Speed Line Is still at The Cutting Edge. Railway Gazette International, Vol. 160, 2004, pp. 677-680.
- Airport Capacity Benchmark Report 2001. U.S. Department of Transportation - Federal Aviation Administration, 2001, p. 195.
- Investigation Into Japanese Crash Begins. International Railway Journal, April 29, 2005, http://www.railjournal.com/latenews_archive.html Last accessed 2009-04-05.
- Briginshaw, D. Safety Must Take Priority. International Railway Journal, Vol. 25, 2005, p. 1.
- Clever, R., Schnelligkeit oder Häufigkeit: Überlegungen zur Einführung des Integralen Taktfahrplans im Fernverkehr der Eisenbahn. Zeitschrift für Verkehrswissenschaft, Vol 67, 1996. pp. 138-182. http://thinkmetric.com/pubs/itf/.